|
|
Post by easmus on Nov 6, 2017 11:08:52 GMT -6
Don't the Coyotes still control their own destiny in regards to the MVFC title? Win out and we win the conference, no? if we win the next 2 the conference records will most likely look this this: USD 9-2 (6-2) NDSU 9-2 (6-2) SDSU 7-4 (5-3) WIU 7-4 (5-3) I think WIU would be 8-3 (5-3). Hard to say with XDSU. |
|
|
|
Post by Yotes on Nov 6, 2017 11:10:55 GMT -6
Don't the Coyotes still control their own destiny in regards to the MVFC title? Win out and we win the conference, no? if we win the next 2 the conference records will most likely look this this: USD 9-2 (6-2) NDSU 9-2 (6-2) SDSU 7-4 (5-3) WIU 7-4 (5-3) We have losses to other 2 loss teams who could also win out, causing a multi-way tie. UNI looks likely to finish 6-2. We could claim a co-title, but tiebreaker won't be friendly to us. |
|
|
|
Post by Yote 53 on Nov 6, 2017 11:58:58 GMT -6
I think with unbalanced scheduling there is no tie breaker. Say USD and UNI both finish at the top with 2 losses UNI cannot claim the outright conference title due to unbalanced scheduling. Basically, if we would have played MSU instead of ISUr this season we would have one less loss and been outright conference champs in that scenario, regardless of losing to UNI.
|
|
|
|
Post by fightsd on Nov 6, 2017 12:03:03 GMT -6
I think with unbalanced scheduling there is no tie breaker. Say USD and UNI both finish at the top with 2 losses UNI cannot claim the outright conference title due to unbalanced scheduling. Basically, if we would have played MSU instead of ISUr this season we would have one less loss and been outright conference champs in that scenario, regardless of losing to UNI. Is that how this actually works? If so, it's kinda BS. Yeah I'd love a share of the championship, but head to head should always break a tie. |
|
|
|
Post by Yotes on Nov 6, 2017 13:59:18 GMT -6
I think with unbalanced scheduling there is no tie breaker. Say USD and UNI both finish at the top with 2 losses UNI cannot claim the outright conference title due to unbalanced scheduling. Basically, if we would have played MSU instead of ISUr this season we would have one less loss and been outright conference champs in that scenario, regardless of losing to UNI. Is that how this actually works? If so, it's kinda BS. Yeah I'd love a share of the championship, but head to head should always break a tie. Head to head would be used to determine who gets the conference autobid, not that a team tied for 1st would need it. Anyone in the tie could claim a conference title though. NDSU probably claims last year as a MVFC title even though they didn't get the autobid. |
|
|
|
Post by usdyotes on Nov 6, 2017 18:14:58 GMT -6
I watched most of the second half yesterday and i personally felt like USD would have been better with Simmons UNI just didn't have to worry about Streveler beating them with his legs which when he is right makes him such a treat that's just my personal opinion. Streveler did a good job running the offense. Putting simmons in would of not helped. Streveler did not cost USD the game the fumbles did period!!! It hapoens. As far as I can remember the end zone int did not cost the team any points the other way but the fumble did. As for the pick 6 he was trying to make something happen. If you noticed the d end on the read side stayed home almost ever play. #7 was swapping sides to rush the qb. So as for him running the ball it was out the window. UNI did enough to keep it close and took advantage of the mistakes. |
|
bt71
Sophomore Member
Posts: 107 
|
Post by bt71 on Nov 6, 2017 18:39:29 GMT -6
I watched most of the second half yesterday and i personally felt like USD would have been better with Simmons UNI just didn't have to worry about Streveler beating them with his legs which when he is right makes him such a treat that's just my personal opinion. Streveler did a good job running the offense. Putting simmons in would of not helped. Streveler did not cost USD the game the fumbles did period!!! It hapoens. As far as I can remember the end zone int did not cost the team any points the other way but the fumble did. As for the pick 6 he was trying to make something happen. If you noticed the d end on the read side stayed home almost ever play. #7 was swapping sides to rush the qb. So as for him running the ball it was out the window. UNI did enough to keep it close and took advantage of the mistakes. Great reply! I really don't think many of you have a solid grasp of how much latitude the qb has in running this offense. While everyone agrees Simmons has an absolute cannon of an arm and can make throws a lot of D-1 qbs can't make, at this point he is nowhere near as mentally prepared to take over this offense. It's just not that easy to throw a guy in there and take over. I guess this situation is the typical "the backup qb is always the most popular guy on the team." |
|
|
|
Post by flagshipU on Nov 6, 2017 20:45:00 GMT -6
Seemed to me like the turning point in the game was the sliding first down catch that the back judge decided he would call incomplete. Don't get me started on the reviews.... But that was the point where I felt the tides turn. The interceptions and the late fumble all happened after, in my opinion, the momentum shifted and the coyotes started to panic Watching the replay on the video board I thought it looked like the ball hit the ground. We totally caught a break on a fumble earlier in the game driving into their red zone that the officials decided they wouldn't review. The crowd was livid. No need to review that one since we recovered the fumble. |
|
|
|
Post by coyotecrazie5 on Nov 9, 2017 18:10:12 GMT -6
3:37 - Still think he was down
|
|
|
|
Post by gopheryote on Nov 10, 2017 7:08:20 GMT -6
How in the world is this a fumble on the field much less through a review??  |
|
|
|
Post by sdyotefan on Nov 10, 2017 14:53:46 GMT -6
gopheryote I agree! And what was real disappointing was they spent about 30 seconds reviewing it. NFL would have been 10 minutes frame by frame....
|
|
|
|
Post by coyotecrazie5 on Nov 10, 2017 15:54:52 GMT -6
FCS reviews are junk and are kept with the ruling on the field 85% of the time. It's helped and hurt us this year, but this one hurt bad. If it was a no fumble we run out the clock for a win most likely.
|
|
