|
Post by yoteforever on Feb 9, 2021 7:17:42 GMT -6
Each school will be different due to their senior class situation, transfers and the like. USD women have 5 seniors listed on their 15 player roster and 3 signed commits for next year. If no one left this year's team, they would be 2 over the normal limit of 15. Seems very manageable for Dawn and staff. I ran out of fingers but in your example we’d have have 3 over normal limit. If all seniors stay it’s truly a great opportunity for Coach P to redshirt any or all which gives those new kids 5 years to play 4 and use the extra year to develop. Just a thought
|
|
|
Post by yotefan90 on Feb 9, 2021 7:43:29 GMT -6
You're right.....I'm old and it was past my bedtime! Thanks for the correction.
|
|
|
Post by kiyoat on Feb 9, 2021 12:17:55 GMT -6
Thanks for the clarification on that. A one-time eligibility extension just for this senior class makes a lot more sense.
|
|
|
Post by Men's League Waterboy on Feb 9, 2021 16:23:27 GMT -6
I am from North Dakota saw this thread here and was wondering how this is going to work with roster construction in the future because my understanding all programs were limited to 15 scholarships and now if you have all these players staying on for extra year how are you going to sign new people if you are limited to 15 scholarships. I have to believe some of these players if they do stay on they will have to pay their way or teams will have limited scholarships for future players. Or is this question of real stars in small and mid majors getting money from the big schools to fill out there teams for this extra year of playing time. I think this is going to be real problem for teams like in Summit conference where they recruit young highly talented players by giving full rides and immediate playing time now number of these recruits may have to sit extra year where they may look else where when deciding on school. I also agree this is going to make gap between the have and have nots even get wider i believe. What were seeing here in North Dakota higher education has had to adjust to less funding and it also reflects back into sports at UND i am wondering if that is same in South Dakota. It seems that schools in Summit each have their sports that they invest into and excel at but very few seem to have that across the board ability to highly invest in all their sports. I wish i could say that we do but i don't see it anymore not like when we were part of old North Central Conference days. No. This year is going to be a one time exception for all sports that qualify. In essence, if you had 3 seniors supposed to be graduating and 3 incoming freshman taking their scholarships, next year all 18 can be on roster with scholarships IF the university elects to fund them. So using my example if you had 3 staying, UND funds them for next year then after the 2022 season those 3 players plus any new seniors would be gone. So let’s say between carryover seniors (3) and this years juniors (4) you would have 7 players depart after 22 season and only 4 schollies available for the 4 natural seniors departing. I’ve been told not all schools are going to fund the extra year though due to budget complications. Plus I do think many athletes that have the so called “extra season” if they want will depart and get on with your life. That being said, what a great opportunity for those girls to get your masters or work towards PhD. Wait, so the only people getting a "free" season are the seniors? Everybody else's eligibility clock is running this year but the seniors?
|
|
|
Post by Men's League Waterboy on Feb 9, 2021 17:13:07 GMT -6
I don't think that's the case.
"For example, a D1 freshman athlete, whether they compete in the 2020-21 competition season or not, is eligible for an extra year of competition. Starting their sophomore year, this athlete competes in 100% of the season through senior year. After their senior season, this athlete’s eligibility count is 3 years and they decide to enroll as a fifth-year senior to compete in their fourth collegiate season. Upon the completion of their fourth competition season, this athlete has the option to compete for one final season, a fifth year, because the NCAA D1 had granted all 2020-21 athletes an extra year of eligibility. If this athlete returns for a fifth year, they will have been a member of the team and eligible to receive financial aid for six year, because their first year of competition didn’t count against their years eligibility."
|
|
|
Post by GoYotes on Feb 9, 2021 17:20:55 GMT -6
My understanding, actually more of a guess, is that everybody get's another year, but you can only exceed 15 scholarships for next year. So in effect, this years senior's can receive a scholarship for next year without counting against the 15 scholarship limit. However, after next season , the total scholarships will be limited to 15. It will make for some interesting roster management decisions over the next couple of years.
|
|
|
Post by Men's League Waterboy on Feb 9, 2021 17:32:03 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by easmus on Feb 9, 2021 19:25:25 GMT -6
Would anyone be shocked if a couple players that aren’t seniors aren’t back? I wouldn’t. That will help the roster size issue.
|
|
|
Post by yoteforever on Feb 9, 2021 20:43:50 GMT -6
My understanding, actually more of a guess, is that everybody get's another year, but you can only exceed 15 scholarships for next year. So in effect, this years senior's can receive a scholarship for next year without counting against the 15 scholarship limit. However, after next season , the total scholarships will be limited to 15. It will make for some interesting roster management decisions over the next couple of years. THIS
|
|
|
Post by Men's League Waterboy on Feb 10, 2021 14:44:07 GMT -6
Would anyone be shocked if a couple players that aren’t seniors aren’t back? I wouldn’t. That will help the roster size issue. Not at all. Which is why I think it’s going to be so interesting. The competition within teams for scholarship spots and development of younger players are all going to have a dimension that we’ve never seen before.
|
|
|
Post by gopheryote on Feb 20, 2021 19:24:16 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by GoYotes on Feb 20, 2021 21:48:07 GMT -6
Mick also wrote an article a couple of weeks ago about Chloe Lamb with this lead in "It’s not what you would call breaking news but University of South Dakota senior Chloe Lamb says she has every intention of coming back for another year of basketball for the Coyotes next season."
|
|
|
Post by kiyoat on Feb 20, 2021 21:49:03 GMT -6
That’s great news! Good for her. And us.
|
|
|
Post by Men's League Waterboy on Feb 20, 2021 23:25:11 GMT -6
Huge.
|
|
|
Post by kiyoat on Feb 24, 2021 10:13:59 GMT -6
Any word if Korngable or Arens are planning on coming back next season?
|
|