|
Post by azsod73 on Dec 15, 2012 10:04:38 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by #1CoyoteFan (Admin) on Dec 15, 2012 14:26:30 GMT -6
Thanks azsod, Williams' comments were right on.
|
|
|
Post by Coyote Fan on Dec 15, 2012 18:40:44 GMT -6
Long term contracts are not as big of a deal that people are making them out to be. If a USD coach signed a 5 year deal and started becoming a coach that lost control of his program wouldn't the administration want the option to get rid of him in year 2. If he had 3 years left on the contract wouldn't that kind of mean that USD would be forced to keep someone they may not have wanted for 3 years. The one year contract rule is not all bad when it comes to coaches. It's somewhat bad and somewhat good.
|
|
|
Post by redwhiteandyote on Dec 15, 2012 22:55:35 GMT -6
Right, coyotefan, but think of it another way: Hard to attract quality candidates down the road for a Division I program. Absolutely no stability within those constraints. Sure, an a.d. can do what he want with a coach no matter the contract, I agree, but not much security when all you can offer a coach is your "word."
|
|
|
Post by #1CoyoteFan (Admin) on Dec 15, 2012 23:27:36 GMT -6
Right, coyotefan, but think of it another way: Hard to attract quality candidates down the road for a Division I program. Absolutely no stability within those constraints. Sure, an a.d. can do what he want with a coach no matter the contract, I agree, but not much security when all you can offer a coach is your "word." Bingo....long term security goes a long way in life.
|
|
|
Post by azsod73 on Dec 18, 2012 21:38:21 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by azsod73 on Dec 19, 2012 14:43:06 GMT -6
|
|