|
Post by sdyotefan on Dec 3, 2020 21:38:37 GMT -6
Just watched the 2nd half of the NC State at SC game that NC State won 54-46. Didn't look at stats but SC missed 6 straight FTs in the 3rd and 4th Q and didn't hit a lot of other shots. Rugged defensive game.
|
|
|
Post by gopheryote on Dec 6, 2020 13:23:40 GMT -6
They should be right now - Iowa St. being ranked is a head-scratcher. SDSU plays Gonzaga on Sunday I think - a W there and they are in for sure. Even in Brookings I think Gonzaga likely has an edge in the matchup. (I was impressed with them.) Maybe we want SDSU to win & be ranked? Then if we sweep them in Brookings we are back into at-large territory? That may be our only shot for at-large? South Carolina beat Iowa State today, so that ranking spot is now open for SDSU. Though, if they get ranked it was because they beat Gonzaga, not ISU.
That, and no doubt a bunch of voters no doubt confused SDSU for USD . (remember when SDSU fans used to say that about USD? Ahhh, good times.)
|
|
|
Post by kiyoat on Dec 7, 2020 9:45:00 GMT -6
I think state beats Zaga on Sunday because even in an empty arena, Frost is a tough place to win. winner winner, chicken dinner.
|
|
|
Post by kiyoat on Dec 7, 2020 15:14:47 GMT -6
Week 2 AP Poll: (as of Sunday) #1 South Carolina#13 Indiana #18 Gonzaga#19 Ohio State #21 Missouri State #23 Iowa State #26 South Dakota State (31 votes)#28 South Dakota (20 votes)Looks like SDSU has a chance to be ranked next week. 12/7 AP Poll update: #5 South Carolina#15 Indiana #18 Ohio State #21 Missouri State #22 South Dakota State#25 Gonzaga
#27 Iowa State (54 votes) #28 South Dakota
Looks like State moved into a nice spot, with an opportunity to move even higher with a win over Missouri State... Meanwhile, SC and the Zags tumble after losses, and we disappear from the rankings. Surprised Iowa State is still that high, TBH. Grit your teeth, and root for all of them, including all the other Summit teams...
|
|
|
Post by kiyoat on Dec 15, 2020 16:01:28 GMT -6
Polls update: AP poll: SDSU #33 (4 votes) Coaches Poll: SDSU #27 (19 votes) USD #34 (6 votes)NDSU #36 (1 vote) This is a good thing, I think. If we can keep getting some votes and keep winning games, we could claw our way back to a ranking in the Coaches Poll. In the grand scheme of things, poll rankings won't technically help you with the selection committee, but I think it helps with national awareness and recognition, .... which can help in recruiting.
|
|
|
Post by Coyote Fan on Dec 16, 2020 1:34:28 GMT -6
Questionable losses don't seem to hurt South Dakota State very much and IMO the Coyotes should be ranked ahead of the Jacks in these polls. The Coyotes have actually not had a questionable loss since at least the 2018-2019 season. I don't believe they have a loss to an unranked top 25 team in nearly 2 years. That is an incredible run really. The Coyotes don't lose games they are not supposed to and actually perform well on the road unlike a particular team.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2020 19:24:31 GMT -6
My Regional Rankings (IA-MN-NE-ND-SD-WI) thru games of 12/17/2020:
#. Team Rec Massey AP Coaches Losses 1.Iowa 4-1 23 39 29 MSU 2.USD 3-2 41 34 SC, Gonzaga 3.SDSU 4-2 47 33 27 KSU, UNI 4.ISU 4-3 31 27 33 Iowa, SDSU, SC 5.Drake 2-3 59 GB, Iowa, SDSU 6.Marqu 5-1 46 Milwaukee 7.Crei 2-4 67 Drake, UNI, SDSU, Uconn 8.NE 3-1 57 Creighton 9.NDSU 4-1 107 35 ISU 10.UNI 3-3 74 Iowa, NDSU, ISU 11.Mil 5-1 69 Bowling Green 12.WI 2-2 79 Iowa, Rutgers 13.MN 1-3 109 Drake, MSU, NW 14.GB 1-4 150 NDSU(2), Milwaukee(2) 15.OMA 1-4 204 ISU, IL, ILL St, KSU 16.UND 0-5 222 Marq, MT ST, MT, WI, NDSU
|
|
|
Post by kiyoat on Dec 18, 2020 20:26:26 GMT -6
^^^^^great idea!
|
|
|
Post by kiyoat on Jan 5, 2021 14:47:06 GMT -6
First NET rankings 1/5/21 LINKNET-----------RPI 41 USD-----9 SDSU42 SDSU---137 NDSU80 NDSU---153 USD206 UMKC---199 UMKC 216 Omaha-- 228 ORU240 Denver--232 Omaha 249 UND-----290 UND 280 WIU-----291 WIU 286 ORU-----302 Denver
|
|
|
Post by kiyoat on Jan 5, 2021 14:53:42 GMT -6
with this ranking, both SD teams will be a little on the outside of an at-large bid (I think). In the past the cut-line for RPI was maybe 35 for mid-majors and 50 for P5 schools. We won't play any more high-ranked teams, so I assume both our rankings will tread water or backslide, even with wins.
OTOH, since the NET looks at offensive/defensive efficiency stats, by trouncing the Summit teams we might have a chance. Who knows?
Also: look at how high ORU is on the RPI. They are terrible, but had a high Strength of Schedule. Just shows how the RPI placed too much weight on that one aspect.
And of course, USD's low RPI is ridiculous.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2021 19:36:11 GMT -6
with this ranking, both SD teams will be a little on the outside of an at-large bid (I think). In the past the cut-line for RPI was maybe 35 for mid-majors and 50 for P5 schools. We won't play any more high-ranked teams, so I assume both our rankings will tread water or backslide, even with wins. OTOH, since the NET looks at offensive/defensive efficiency stats, by trouncing the Summit teams we might have a chance. Who knows? Also: look at how high ORU is on the RPI. They are terrible, but had a high Strength of Schedule. Just shows how the RPI placed too much weight on that one aspect. And of course, USD's low RPI is ridiculous. It would be nice if we could pick up another game against a quality opponent next week during our bye week.
|
|
|
Post by kiyoat on Jan 5, 2021 20:22:25 GMT -6
Sure, that would be good for our sos. Luckily we are no longer dealing with the stupid RPI rankings anymore, so maybe we will still have a chance to prove ourselves as a worthy team by just being awesome (having a high net efficiency score).
|
|
|
Post by gopheryote on Jan 6, 2021 9:33:51 GMT -6
One thing that will be interesting to watch play out - this year only - is that NET treats home vs. away differently. Since there isn't a balanced conference schedule this year, it is possible that either USD or SDSU could not see the large drop. Maybe beating a top 150 or so on the road isn't as negative? Though beating that same team at home still won't help though.
|
|
|
Post by kiyoat on Jan 6, 2021 9:37:27 GMT -6
For anyone interested in why the NET is different than the RPI, .... There are components of the NET that mirror the RPI, using Wins, Losses, Strength of schedule, and weather the win was Home, Road, or Neutral Location. The calculation is a little different, but substantially the same. Then there is the "Net efficiency" part. Net efficiency is the "offensive efficiency" minus the "defensive efficiency". The Off Efficiency is the "points scored per possession" The Def Efficiency is the "points given up per possession" So I haven't found a source that ranks these for all the D1 teams, since these aren't standard stats..... BUT........ "Scoring Margin" somewhat gives you the same thing, minus the number of possessions. So here are the National rankings for Scoring Margin: margin | rank | team | 16.1 | 43 | USD | 6.4 | 101 | NDSU | 5.7 | 108 | SDSU | 2.1 | 141 | KC | -10.4 | 282 | Denver | -11.4 | 290 | UND | -12.6 | 295 | WIU | -13.0 | 297 | Omaha | -21.0 | 319 | ORU |
|
|
|
Post by kiyoat on Jan 6, 2021 9:39:40 GMT -6
One thing that will be interesting to watch play out - this year only - is that NET treats home vs. away differently. Since there isn't a balanced conference schedule this year, it is possible that either USD or SDSU could not see the large drop. Maybe beating a top 150 or so on the road isn't as negative? Though beating that same team at home still won't help though. The RPI was adjusted a number of years ago to weight home/away/neutral as well, but I don't know to what degree compared with the NET. The new formula might weight it more, but I couldn't say.
|
|