|
|
Post by jackl on Jan 28, 2016 8:17:21 GMT -6
So I heard Side Show Bob has not signed his contract yet. Is there a chance that the 3 year contract won't pass? Won't SDSU coach want a raise, and get a 3 year contract too? How about the basketball coaches. Do your recruits know he isn't signed? Will he now leave after just 1 year, if he signs at all? Bob is a better then average coach, but is he really worth rocking the whole system? Good luck next year, and no hard feelings. It's just business! Bob isn't the one that's the side show here. What an embarrassment. |
|
|
|
Post by yote14 on Jan 28, 2016 10:25:00 GMT -6
Not sure if Huskie is a jack or WIU fan but there is quite the uproar on the bunny board about this right now too. There are some posters stating reasonable statements on the issue but a majority seem to think Herbster and USD are breaking BOR and State laws by doing this. One even called for Herbster to resign immediately. Not sure where any of that comes from.
I know there are people on both sides of the fence regarding one year contracts but If multi year contracts do not matter than I can see no issue with this rule getting changed. Why the uproar by state fans? If the rule/law is changed they can continue to offer one year contracts same as they are now. If there is no benefit to it we can foolishly offer multi year contracts and will gain no advantage from it.
|
|
|
|
Post by golfingyote on Jan 28, 2016 10:33:47 GMT -6
I have been following their discussion as well. They seem to be more upset by the way it looks (usd forcing the BOR hand). However, its hard to determine how many of them are mad about the process or just butt hurt that Herbie got this done before any of their AD's could. Its funny to me. They have threads on their board that talk about skirting the one year deals when Nagy and Johnson were rumored to be considering other jobs, now they get outraged when USD gets the BOR to review this policy.
|
|
|
|
Post by coyotecrazie5 on Jan 28, 2016 10:47:04 GMT -6
I expect nothing less. Par for the course up north.
|
|
|
|
Post by yote14 on Jan 28, 2016 11:15:52 GMT -6
I do find it interesting that if Nielson has not "officially" signed his contract yet how is his salary updated already on the state of South Dakota's website for state employee salaries? I do not know either way but it almost seems like he signed the one year contract and USD is now trying to get the multi year contract approved. The Argus article makes it seem as if USD is holding the BOR hostage to get this approved or trying to pull a fast one. bfm.sd.gov/ledger/employee.asp |
|
|
|
Post by Yotes on Jan 28, 2016 11:44:48 GMT -6
A salaried employee an not draw their salary without having a contract on file, correct? There is just no way that Bob is here and getting paid without some inked papers. I will say again there had to have been some assurance by the BOR that a multi year contract would be allowed. No way our administration makes this announcement on a prayer that the BOR agrees to look at the policy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yotes on Jan 28, 2016 11:53:10 GMT -6
So I heard Side Show Bob has not signed his contract yet. Is there a chance that the 3 year contract won't pass? Won't SDSU coach want a raise, and get a 3 year contract too? How about the basketball coaches. Do your recruits know he isn't signed? Will he now leave after just 1 year, if he signs at all? Bob is a better then average coach, but is he really worth rocking the whole system? Good luck next year, and no hard feelings. It's just business! Bob isn't the one that's the side show here. What an embarrassment. If you want to incessantly complain about anything and everything go right ahead, it's a pretty shitty way to live your life. Some pretty basic logic says that any controversy here is being created by those who want drama. |
|
|
|
Post by Yote 53 on Jan 28, 2016 12:31:32 GMT -6
Now up to 7 pages on the Bunny Board. Any of you Jack fans want to copy and paste the following quote for me because I refuse to post over there ever again? Here goes..."You people (SDSU fans) are F**king Dumb."
Thank you.
|
|
wiley
Freshman Member
Posts: 85 
|
Post by wiley on Jan 28, 2016 12:44:17 GMT -6
Will be interesting to see what they're saying after Nagy and Stig leave. You'd think they'd be in support of multi-year contracts given the similar situation they will be in soon, but that would require actual, coherent thought.
|
|
dave
Sophomore Member
Posts: 112
|
Post by dave on Jan 28, 2016 13:33:36 GMT -6
Does anyone know if the one year contracts are a BOR policy or state law? I was always under the impression it was state law.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2016 13:34:40 GMT -6
Will be interesting to see what they're saying after Nagy and Stig leave. You'd think they'd be in support of multi-year contracts given the similar situation they will be in soon, but that would require actual, coherent thought. Stig will retire at SDSU. Nagy and AJ aren't money people. They are one of of the longest tenure coaches in D1. Obviously the 1 year contract deals are that big of a deal to them. |
|
|
|
Post by coyotecrazie5 on Jan 28, 2016 13:46:11 GMT -6
San, he means when they retire, not if they will leave.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2016 13:53:37 GMT -6
San, he means when they retire, not if they will leave. It didn't come off that way to me. If he actually said retire instead of leave, that would have cleared things up.  |
|
|
|
Post by coyotecrazie5 on Jan 28, 2016 13:56:32 GMT -6
I'm not trying to put words in Wiley's mouth, but I guess that is what I thought he meant. I don't see any of them leaving except for retirement unless something crazy happens.
|
|
wiley
Freshman Member
Posts: 85
|
Post by wiley on Jan 28, 2016 14:52:38 GMT -6
They won't fire Stig, and clearly Nagy is bullet proof as well if they're not going to can him after the seasons they had in the mid to late 2000's. So yes, I meant retire, but you're missing the whole point. Fact is, once they're gone, having a multi-year contract to offer good coaching candidates is much more lucrative than a 1 year deal. Sure it doesn't bother any of the current coaches. They've been around long enough to know they will have a contract waiting the following year as well. Will the new coach know that when he starts? Unlikely.
|
|
